设为首页 友情链接
在线留言 发表文章
加入收藏 广告联系

刺猬首页

| 专案技术 | 网络技术 | 图形图象 | 网络编程 | 网页设计 | 操作系统 | 服务器 | 技术白皮书 | 在线实验室 | 刺猬论坛 |
小说专版  | 数据库 | 设计赏析 | 存储频道 | 网络安全 | 私服架设 |  Solaris | 网站评估 | PC维护技巧 | 下载中心 | 博 客 |
专   题: | Linux | java | cisco | 防病毒 | 刀片 | SOA | iscsi | ASP.NET | SQL | Oracle |
您现在的位置: IT公社 IT community >> 思科学堂 >> Cisco官方配置资料 >> 文章正文 用户登录 新用户注册
专 题 栏 目
最 新 热 门
最 新 推 荐
相 关 文 章
CSU/DSU:信道服务单元/
Internetworking Basics
Catalyst 3550-Configur
LAN Switching and VLAN
RIP and OSPF Redistrib
  [组图]UDP Broadcast Flooding         ★★★
UDP Broadcast Flooding
 

configure UDP flooding on Router B. Because this configuration specifies a lower path cost than the default (bridge-group 1 path-cost 50) and because the configuration of Router A accepts the default, Router B forwards UDP packets. Because this configuration specifies an IRDP preference of 90 (ip irdp preference 90) and because Router A specifies a IRDP preference of 100, Router B acts as the backup for Router A for forwarding unicast traffic from the trader networks.

!Router B
ip forward-protocol spanning-tree
ip forward-protocol udp 111
ip forward-protocol udp 3001
ip forward-protocol udp 3002
ip forward-protocol udp 3003
ip forward-protocol udp 3004
ip forward-protocol udp 3005
ip forward-protocol udp 3006
ip forward-protocol udp 5020
ip forward-protocol udp 5021
ip forward-protocol udp 5030
ip forward-protocol udp 5002
ip forward-protocol udp 1027
ip forward-protocol udp 657
!
interface ethernet 0
ip address 200.200.200.62 255.255.255.0
ip broadcast-address 200.200.200.255
no mop enabled
!
interface ethernet 1
ip address 164.53.7.62 255.255.255.192
ip broadcast-address 164.53.7.63
ip irdp
ip irdp maxadvertinterval 60
ip irdp minadvertinterval 45
ip irdp holdtime 60
ip irdp preference 90
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 path-cost 50
bridge-group 1 input-type-list 201
no mop enabled
!
interface ethernet 2
ip address 164.53.8.62 255.255.255.192
ip broadcast-address 164.53.8.63
ip irdp
ip irdp maxadvertinterval 60
ip irdp minadvertinterval 45
ip irdp holdtime 60
ip irdp preference 90
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 path-cost 50
bridge-group 1 input-type-list 201
no mop enabled
!
interface ethernet 3
ip address 164.53.9.62 255.255.255.192
ip broadcast-address 164.53.9.63
ip irdp
ip irdp maxadvertinterval 60
ip irdp minadvertinterval 45
ip irdp holdtime 60
ip irdp preference 90
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 path-cost 50
bridge-group 1 input-type-list 201
no mop enabled
!
interface ethernet 4
ip address 164.53.10.62 255.255.255.192
ip broadcast-address 164.53.10.63
ip irdp
ip irdp maxadvertinterval 60
ip irdp minadvertinterval 45
ip irdp holdtime 60
ip irdp preference 90
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 path-cost 50
bridge-group 1 input-type-list 201
no mop enabled
!
router igrp 1
network 164.53.0.0
!
ip name-server 255.255.255.255
snmp-server community public RW
snmp-server host 164.53.7.15 public
bridge 1 protocol dec
bridge 1 priority 255
access-list 201 deny 0xFFFF 0x0000

Note In releases prior to Cisco IOS Software Release 10.2, the spanning tree algorithm prevented the forwarding of local broadcast addresses, but allowed the forwarding of local secondary addresses. For that reason, when running a release prior to Cisco IOS Software Release 10.2, a secondary address must be specified for each Ethernet interface that will forward local broadcast address packets. The secondary address is used to forward packets, whereas the primary address is never used. In such configurations, the secondary addresses are assigned to an Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (IGRP) group instead of the primary address.


Summary

Although IP helper addressing is useful in networks that do not require redundancy, when configured in networks that feature redundancy, IP helper addressing results in packet duplication that severely reduces router and network performance.

By configuring UDP flooding, one router forwards UDP traffic without burdening the second router with duplicate packets. By dedicating one router to the task of forwarding UDP traffic, the second router becomes available for forwarding unicast traffic. At the same time, because each router is configured as the backup for the other router, redundancy is maintained; if either router fails, the other router can assume the work of the failed router without intervention from an operator. When compared with IP helper addressing, UDP flooding makes the most efficient use of router resources.

上一页  [1] [2] [3] 

频道声明:本频道的文章除部分特别声明禁止转载的专稿外,可以自由转载.但请务必注明出出处和原始作者 文章版权归本频道与文章作者所有.对于被频道转载文章的个人和网站,我们表示深深的谢意。

原始作者:佚名 录入时间:2006-9-29 2:41:51
信息来源:不详 投稿信箱:itqoo@126.com
文章录入:itqoo    责任编辑:itqoo 
  • 上一篇文章:

  • 下一篇文章:
  • 【字体: 】【发表评论】【加入收藏】【告诉好友】【打印此文】【关闭窗口
      网友评论:(只显示最新10条。评论内容只代表网友观点,与本站立场无关!)
    - 关于我们 - 合作伙伴 - 友情链接 - 广告刊登 - 投稿热线 - 在线留言版权声明联系方式 -
    IT公社版权所有 粤ICP备05127012号
    Copyrigh@2005-2006 itqoo.com.Inc All Rights Reserved  推荐分辨率 1024*768
    联系站长:E-Mail:itqoo@126.com     MSN:urchincc@hotmail.com    QQ:点击这里给我发消息
    特别感谢:亿太网络提供空间支持