设为首页 友情链接
在线留言 发表文章
加入收藏 广告联系

刺猬首页

| 专案技术 | 网络技术 | 图形图象 | 网络编程 | 网页设计 | 操作系统 | 服务器 | 技术白皮书 | 在线实验室 | 刺猬论坛 |
小说专版  | 数据库 | 设计赏析 | 存储频道 | 网络安全 | 私服架设 |  Solaris | 网站评估 | PC维护技巧 | 下载中心 | 博 客 |
专   题: | Linux | java | cisco | 防病毒 | 刀片 | SOA | iscsi | ASP.NET | SQL | Oracle |
您现在的位置: IT公社 IT community >> 专案技术 >> 路由器 >> 文章正文 用户登录 新用户注册
专 题 栏 目
最 新 热 门
最 新 推 荐
相 关 文 章
Exchanging routes betw…
路由翻动惩罚-Route Fl…
防火墙、UTM产品硬件平台…
Firewalling 及 Proxy S…
浅谈以太网的Auto-Negot…
Netscount性能管理方案
NetFlow Tracker-A soun…
常用品牌交换机端口镜像…
代理(Proxy)软件全集
网络与网间吞吐量的测试…
  Routing Basics           
Routing Basics
 

What Is Routing?Routing ComponentsPath DeterminationSwitchingRouting AlgorithmsDesign GoalsAlgorithm TypesStatic Versus DynamicSingle-Path Versus MultipathFlat Versus HierarchicalHost-Intelligent Versus Router-IntelligentIntradomain Versus InterdomainLink-State Versus Distance VectorRouting MetricsNetwork ProtocolsReview QuestionsChapter GoalsLearn the basics of routing protocols. Learn the differences between link-state and distance vector routing protocols. Learn about the metrics used by routing protocols to determine path selection. Learn the basics of how data travels from end stations through intermediate stations and on to the destination end station. Understand the difference between routed protocols and routing protocols. Routing BasicsThis chapter introduces the underlying concepts widely used in routing protocols. Topics summarized here include routing protocol components and algorithms. In addition, the role of routing protocols is briefly contrasted with the role of routed or network protocols. Subsequent chapters in Part VII, Routing Protocols, address specific routing protocols in more detail, while the network protocols that use routing protocols are discussed in Part VI, Network Protocols.What Is Routing?Routing is the act of moving information across an internetwork from a source to a destination. Along the way, at least one intermediate node typically is encountered. Routing is often contrasted with bridging, which might seem to accomplish precisely the same thing to the casual observer. The primary difference between the two is that bridging occurs at Layer 2 (the link layer) of the OSI reference model, whereas routing occurs at Layer 3 (the network layer). This distinction provides routing and bridging with different information to use in the process of moving information from source to destination, so the two functions accomplish their tasks in different ways.The topic of routing has been covered in computer science literature for more than two decades, but routing achieved commercial popularity as late as the mid-1980s. The primary reason for this time lag is that networks in the 1970s were simple, homogeneous environments. Only relatively recently has large-scale internetworking become popular.Routing ComponentsRouting involves two basic activities: determining optimal routing paths and transporting information groups (typically called packets) through an internetwork. In the context of the routing process, the latter of these is referred to as packet switching. Although packet switching is relatively straightforward, path determination can be very complex.Path DeterminationRouting protocols use metrics to evaluate what path will be the best for a packet to travel. A metric is a standard of measurement, such as path bandwidth, that is used by routing algorithms to determine the optimal path to a destination. To aid the process of path determination, routing algorithms initialize and maintain routing tables, which contain route information. Route information varies depending on the routing algorithm used.Routing algorithms fill routing tables with a variety of information. Destination/next hop associations tell a router that a particular destination can be reached optimally by sending the packet to a particular router representing the next hop on the way to the final destination. When a router receives an incoming packet, it checks the destination address and attempts to associate this address with a next hop. Figure 5-1 depicts a sample destination/next hop routing table.Figure 5-1: Destination/Next Hop Associations Determine the Datas Optimal Path Routing tables also can contain other information, such as data about the desirability of a path. Routers compare metrics to determine optimal routes, and these metrics differ depending on the design of the routing algorithm used. A variety of common metrics will be introduced and described later in this chapter.Routers communicate with one another and maintain their routing tables through the transmission of a variety of messages. The routing update message is one such message that generally consists of all or a portion of a routing table. By analyzing routing updates from all other routers, a router can build a detailed picture of network topology. A link-state advertisement, another example of a message sent between routers, informs other routers of the state of the senders links. Link information also can be used to build a complete picture of network topology to enable routers to determine optimal routes to network destinations.本新闻共4页,当前在第1页  1  2  3  4   SwitchingSwitching algorithms is relatively simple; it is the same for most routing protocols. In most cases, a host determines that it must send a packet to another host. Having acquired a routers address by some means, the source host sends a packet addressed specifically to a routers physical (Media Access Control [MAC]-layer) address, this time with the protocol (network layer) address of the destination host.As it examines the packets destination protocol address, the router determines that it either knows or does not know how to forward the packet to the next hop. If the router does not know how to forward the packet, it typically drops the packet. If the router knows how to forward the packet, however, it changes the destination physical address to that of the next hop and transmits the packet.The next hop may be the ultimate destination host. If not, the next hop is usually another router, which executes the same switching decision process. As the packet moves through the internetwork, its physical address changes, but its protocol address remains constant, as illustrated in Figure 5-2.The preceding discussion describes switching between a source and a destination end system. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has developed a hierarchical terminology that is useful in describing this process. Using this terminology, network devices without the capability to forward packets between subnetworks are called end systems (ESs), whereas network devices with these capabilities are called intermediate systems (ISs). ISs are further divided into those that can communicate within routing domains (intradomain ISs) and those that communicate both within and between routing domains (interdomain ISs). A routing domain generally is considered a portion of an internetwork under common administrative authority that is regulated by a particular set of administrative guidelines. Routing domains are also called autonomous systems. With certain protocols, routing domains can be divided into routing areas, but intradomain routing protocols are still used for switching both within and between areas.Figure 5-2: Numerous Routers May Come into Play During the Switching Process Routing AlgorithmsRouting algorithms can be differentiated based on several key characteristics. First, the particular goals of the algorithm designer affect the operation of the resulting routing protocol. Second, various types of routing algorithms exist, and each algorithm has a different impact on network and router resources. Finally, routing algorithms use a variety of metrics that affect calculation of optimal routes. The following sections analyze these routing algorithm attributes.本新闻共4页,当前在第2页  1  2  3  4   Design GoalsRouting algorithms often have one or more of the following design goals:Optimality Simplicity and low overhead Robustness and stability Rapid convergence Flexibility Optimality refers to the capability of the routing algorithm to select the best route, which depends on the metrics and metric weightings used to make the calculation. For example, one routing algorithm may use a number of hops and delays, but it may weigh delay more heavily in the calculation. Naturally, routing protocols must define their metric calculation algorithms strictly.Routing algorithms also are designed to be as simple as possible. In other words, the routing algorithm must offer its functionality efficiently, with a minimum of software and utilization overhead. Efficiency is particularly important when the software implementing the routing algorithm must run on a computer with limited physical resources.Routing algorithms must be robust, which means that they should perform correctly in the face of unusual or unforeseen circumstances, such as hardware failures, high load conditions, and incorrect implementations. Because routers are located at network junction points, they can cause considerable problems when they fail. The best routing algorithms are often those that have withstood the test of time and that have proven stable under a variety of network conditions.In addition, routing algorithms must converge rapidly. Convergence is the process of agreement, by all routers, on optimal routes. When a network event causes routes to either go down or become available, routers distribute routing update messages that permeate networks, stimulating recalculation of optimal routes and eventually causing all routers to agree on these routes. Routing algorithms that converge slowly can cause routing loops or network outages.In the routing loop displayed in Figure 5-3, a packet arrives at Router 1 at time t1. Router 1 already has been updated and thus knows that the optimal route to the destination calls for Router 2 to be the next stop. Router 1 therefore forwards the packet to Router 2, but because this router has not yet been updated, it believes that the optimal next hop is Router 1. Router 2 therefore forwards the packet back to Router 1, and the packet continues to bounce back and forth between the two routers until Router 2 receives its routing update or until the packet has been switched the maximum number of times allowed.Figure 5-3: Slow Convergence and Routing Loops Can Hinder Progress Routin

[1] [2] [3] 下一页

频道声明:本频道的文章除部分特别声明禁止转载的专稿外,可以自由转载.但请务必注明出出处和原始作者 文章版权归本频道与文章作者所有.对于被频道转载文章的个人和网站,我们表示深深的谢意。

原始作者:佚名 录入时间:2006-12-26 2:57:31
信息来源:不详 投稿信箱:itqoo@126.com
文章录入:itqoo    责任编辑:itqoo 
  • 上一个文章:

  • 下一个文章:
  • 【字体: 】【发表评论】【加入收藏】【告诉好友】【打印此文】【关闭窗口
      网友评论:(只显示最新10条。评论内容只代表网友观点,与本站立场无关!)
    - 关于我们 - 合作伙伴 - 友情链接 - 广告刊登 - 投稿热线 - 在线留言版权声明联系方式 -
    IT公社版权所有 粤ICP备05127012号
    Copyrigh@2005-2006 itqoo.com.Inc All Rights Reserved  推荐分辨率 1024*768
    联系站长:E-Mail:itqoo@126.com     MSN:urchincc@hotmail.com    QQ:点击这里给我发消息
    特别感谢:亿太网络提供空间支持